Saturday, August 29, 2015

Dressing for Church

Dressing for Church


Nearly everybody in America has heard of the Tony Award® winning musical Fiddler on the Roof.  The major theme in the book by Joseph Stein is Tevye’s attempt to maintain his family and Jewish traditions while modern ideas lure those around him away.

This theme works well because of its universal appeal.  This is the age-old battle between generations.  Life in the Church is not immune to the pull of this battle.  However, we owe it to ourselves, our progeny, and The Lord to make sure we break from the cycle and make our decisions based on a proper, Biblical perspective.  Remember, “We’ve always done it that way” is no reason to do something, and no reason to not do something either!

The following is the first installment of an open-ended series of topics that follow this vein.

There is a movement well underway to reverse the historical custom of “dressing up” for church.  Many cite comfort for their bent while others insist that being “too formal” could drive away prospects by making them feel uncomfortable.  Still others say that this habit is outmoded and irrelevant.  Let’s take a brief look into the matter.

You may be too young to remember that in “olden times” we called the place that we gathered for worship the “Sanctuary”.  Obviously, it was understood that the individual Christians gathered together were “the Church” but the term, obviously, bears the idea of sanctification.  Sanctification is the carrying on to perfection the work begun in regeneration, and it extends to the whole man.2  Romans 6:13  To sanctify is “to make holy, to set apart as sacred, consecrate”.1  Consecration is the devoting or setting apart of anything to the worship or service of God. In the New Testament, Christians are regarded as consecrated to the Lord.2  1Pet 2:9  “As we dedicate our church buildings, we set them apart for sacred uses, the service and worship of God.  As the vessels of the Temple were dedicated or sanctified for special and sacred purposes, so of God’s people.3  Naturally, with the idea of sanctification, the concept of quality follows closely behind.  Weren’t the Children of Israel chided for making a practice of bringing blind, halted, and diseased sacrifices before Him?  Are we not instructed to present ourselves “…holy, and acceptable unto God…”?  Rom 12:1  Perhaps I have missed something, but I can’t find the passage in Scripture that says: “Oh, don’t make a fuss!” 

Many folks will say:  “I’m just not comfortable dressed up.”  Well, I would point out that, if worship is about your comfort, then it really isn’t worship at all.  I remember very clearly when I got myself to a church because God had revealed Himself to me through the wonder of creation.  I got my appearance together as best I could, but I would not be dissuaded from surrendering to God. I didn’t know what to do and had never seen a Baptist service or any invitation before.  None the less, when the pastor extended the invitation, I immediately, and almost running, got down that aisle and, in spite of my lack of knowing the “lingo” indicated what I had come for. I didn’t know or care what anyone thought.  Furthermore, it’s plain to see to anyone that if a seeker is at all serious, he will not be intimidated by anybody’s dress.  If we’re kind, and winsome, any awkwardness that they might have felt will be instantly dispelled in the face of our welcoming spirit.

When The Lord commanded the building of the tabernacle and later the temple, He was painting an elaborate picture of His plan to be with His people.  Everything in the temple had meaning and pointed to and honored the Lamb to come, The Christ.  The varying substances and materials speak of his purity, holiness, etc..  Likewise, the priests made elaborate preparation following complex instructions to the letter.  However, at Jesus’ death, the veil was torn signifying our access to the Holy of Holies eliminating the need for an intermediary.  The “priesthood of the believer” that resulted allowed for direct and personal access to the very throne room of God.  However, there was no corresponding incident indicating that what would take place as we met God would be any less important than it had been in the past.  The gold did not turn to rusty iron, nor the bronze to clay.  The veil was the only “casual-ty” that day.

Finally, for all of you students of culture, intellect and understanding who mistakenly take the phenomenon of dressing up as purely western or American, I would like you to consider that every people group that has ever existed on this planet either dressed up or did something special with their appearance for important occasions.  It is deep within who we are to honor what is important with how we dress.  Even if somehow one has escaped the bonds of his humanity (which he cannot), and no longer need to dress for what’s important, he remains a witness of Christ, and, as such has an obligation of a clear testimony regardless of the happenings within popular culture.  You see, the rest of humanity may fight that inner voice, the urge, to honor the important and not want to dress up for anything, but our testimony must still point to a Holy God, worthy of honor.  Our Lord still desires our sanctification. 
Thomas Aquinas provides one more model for engaging clothing. He believed we have a moral obligation to compose our outward manners—including our dress—in light of the person we are addressing, the company we are with, the business we are pursuing, and the place we are in. He claimed that a truly virtuous life includes the art of savoir faire—“a sense of occasion discerning differences of situation”—and that this should inform the clothing we wear.4
He still desires to be glorified in the Temple. 1 Corinthians 6:19-20  To defy this represents an agenda outside of what we are, focused on self, juxtaposed to scripture and, therefore dishonoring to God.

So, in this case, at least, the problem seems to have been that we forgot why “…we did it that way”.  The tradition wasn’t wrong at all, we just forgot to keep teaching the “why” of it.

1  Dictionary.com
Easton’s Bible Dictionary
What Baptists Believe and Why They Believe It  JG Bow, D.D.

4  “The Biblical Meaning of Clothing” In Christianity Today Robert Covolo/ August 28, 2015

Saturday, August 22, 2015

The Ultimate Proof

The Ultimate Proof

The other day a friend posted, on Facebook, a couple of Graphics that illustrated the vastness of the universe.  This reminded me of two things: how I came to know Jesus, and how most scientists cite their science for why they don’t believe in God.  I respect people who live by their convictions.  To be able to hypothesize, experiment, conclude, repeat and prove is very slick.  It removes all doubt and leaves the scientist with every reason to believe these things until the day he dies.  However, this requires (especially if these are important, life and death matters.) a very strict adherence to the scientific method, yes?  The quest for truth must be pure and honest and the scientist must accept the findings.  Agreed?  Well do I have an experiment for you!
Assuming that we all agree that if there is a God out there, and we discover Him we would naturally want to relate to Him; even follow Him, right?  The thesis question is:  Is there a God?.  The theory is that God does exist.  So, the task is to set up an accurate and reproducible experiment to prove the existence of God.  Don’t get antsy on me.  Obviously we cannot prove that something does not exist.  That wouldn’t be scientific.
Here is the experiment.  With that open, very scientific mind, determined to relate to God if you find Him, simply say silently in your heart:  “God, if you exist, show yourself to me, and I will give myself to you.”  I can almost hear people saying aloud:  That’s a rip off!  That’s not scientific!  Perhaps the method is, after all the posturing not scientific.  However, to declare it faulty without a test would also be unscientific.  I submit, for those doubtful of the experiment, the easiest way to prove that I am a religious idiot is to go ahead and conduct the experiment.  Conduct the experiment exactly as stated.  If you fail to do so, you forever will have ignored the assertion based on prejudice rather than scientific proof rendering you a poor scientist and forever without a conclusive answer on the topic.  Of course, if you are a good scientist, you must test it or make no declaration.  However, most will never do this because, like those who thought the earth was flat, you can’t deal with the truth, and what it might do to your little world, but choose to skew your findings to fulfill your “science”.  Are you a good scientist?  Do the experiment.  I dare you.

I know that this experiment works because I conducted it myself in 1973.  I did it just that way.  I figured if there is a God, I would want to serve Him, but if there is not, it would not hurt to conduct the test.  I had a limited understanding of prayer and knew of silent prayer and figured, if this God was indeed God, He could surely hear my silent prayers.  So, silently, secretly, and with solemn intent, I made Him the offer.  Soon everything in my world began to change.  I beheld the stars and did not see a big bang.  I saw a child and did not see an evolutionary step.  I saw in nature around me an unmistakable harmony, and rhythmic pattern that was undoubtedly God’s doing!  Now, since he now lives in me, He manifests Himself to me and gives me peace and assurance that He does indeed exist.